Shouting fire in a crowded theater

"Shouting fire in a crowded theater" is a popular analogy for speech or actions made for the principal purpose of creating panic. The phrase is a paraphrasing of Justice Oliver Wendell Holmes, Jr.'s opinion in the United States Supreme Court case Schenck v. United States in 1919, which held that the defendant's speech in opposition to the draft during World War I was not protected free speech under the First Amendment of the United States Constitution. The case was later partially overturned by Brandenburg v. Ohio in 1969, which limited the scope of banned speech to that which would be directed to and likely to incite imminent lawless action (e.g. a riot).

The paraphrasing differs from Holmes's original wording in that it typically does not include the word falsely, while also adding the word "crowded" to describe the theatre.

It is legal in the United States to falsely shout fire in a theater under particular circumstances. The act of shouting fire is not a crime in itself. However, if a bystander calls for emergency services, or if someone is hurt, or if a court can argue that there was the intent to start a panic, then the act of falsely shouting fire is indeed a crime. For example, state laws such as Colorado Revised Statute § 18-8-111 classify a "false alarm of fire" as a felony if the act results in the harm of another person. In the same statute it is a misdemeanor if a person falsely shouts fire and "...knowingly causes the transmission of a report to law enforcement..." In the State of Georgia, under O.C.G.A. §16-10-27 it is a crime to falsely report a fire to emergency services if there are no reasonable grounds to believe that such a fire exists. Depending on the circumstances, various crimes may be committed by shouting fire in a theater as defined by state statutes. Shouting "fire" is only partially protected speech under the First Amendment to the United States Constitution as affirmed in the Brandenburg v. Ohio Supreme Court decision of 1969.

The Schenck case

Decision

Holmes, writing for a unanimous Court, ruled that it was a violation of the Espionage Act of 1917 (amended by the Sedition Act of 1918) to distribute flyers opposing the draft during World War I. Holmes argued that this abridgment of free speech was permissible because it presented a "clear and present danger" to the government's recruitment efforts for the war. Holmes wrote:

The most stringent protection of free speech would not protect a man falsely shouting fire in a theatre and causing a panic... The question in every case is whether the words used are used in such circumstances and are of such a nature as to create a clear and present danger that they will bring about the substantive evils that Congress has a right to prevent.

Legacy

The First Amendment holding in Schenck was later partially overturned by Brandenburg v. Ohio in 1969, in which the Supreme Court held that "the constitutional guarantees of free speech and free press do not permit a State to forbid or proscribe advocacy of the use of force or of law violation except where such advocacy is directed to inciting or producing imminent lawless action [e.g., a riot] and is likely to incite or produce such action." The test in Brandenburg is the current Supreme Court jurisprudence on the ability of government to punish speech after it occurs. Despite Schenck being limited, the phrase "shouting fire in a crowded theater" has become synonymous with speech that, because of its danger of provoking violence, is not protected by the First Amendment.

Criticism

A version of Chafee's article

Christopher M. Finan, Executive Director of the National Coalition Against Censorship, writes that Justice Holmes began to doubt his decision due to criticism received from free-speech activists. He also met the legal scholar Zechariah Chafee and discussed his Harvard Law Review article "Freedom of Speech in War Times". According to Finan, Holmes's change of heart influenced his decision to join the minority and dissent in the Abrams v. United States case. Abrams was deported for issuing flyers saying the US should not intervene in the Russian Revolution. Holmes and Brandeis said that "a silly leaflet by an unknown man" should not be considered illegal. Chafee argued in Free Speech in the United States that a better analogy in Schenck might be a man who stands in a theatre and warns the audience that there are not enough fire exits.

In his introductory remarks to a 2006 debate in defense of free speech, writer Christopher Hitchens parodied the Holmes judgment by opening "FIRE! Fire, fire... fire. Now you've heard it", before condemning the famous analogy as "the fatuous verdict of the greatly over-praised Justice Oliver Wendell Holmes." Hitchens argued that the "Yiddish speaking socialists" protesting America's entry into World War I, who were imprisoned by the Court's decision, "were the real fire fighters, were the ones shouting fire when there really was a fire, in a very crowded theatre indeed. And who is to decide?"

Writer Emma Camp has pointed out that Schenk v. United States did not actually address the question of whether or not it is illegal to "shout fire in a crowded theater", since this analogy was simply non-binding dictum used to illustrate Justice Holmes' point.

Historical instances

People have falsely shouted "Fire!" or been misheard in crowded public venues and caused panics on several occasions, such as:

  • At Mount Morris Theater, Harlem, New York City in September 1884. During the fire scene of 'Storm Beaten', someone in the gallery shouted "Fire!" three times. The performance continued and a Roundsman and a Policeman arrested a young man.
  • In the Shiloh Baptist Church stampede, Birmingham, Alabama on September 19, 1902. Over 100 people died when someone in the choir yelled, "There's a fight!". "Fight" was misheard as "fire" in a crowded church of approximately 3000 people, causing a panic and stampede.
  • In the Italian Hall disaster, Calumet, Michigan on December 24, 1913. Seventy-three men, women, and children, mostly striking mine workers and their families, were crushed to death in a stampede when someone falsely shouted "Fire!" at a crowded Christmas party.
  • In the Basilica of St. Teresa, Caracas, Venezuela on 9 Apr 1952. 50 people were trampled to death after someone shouted "Fire!". 40 people were arrested in connection with the crush.
  • At Raymond Cinema 3, Mandaluyong, Metro Manila on December 26, 1987. One 13-year-old girl died from internal haemorrhage while many moviegoers, mostly women, were injured due to a stampede that began when a man shouted "Sunog!" (lit.'Fire!') three times at the packed theater during an evening screening of the Metro Manila Film Festival entry Huwag Mong Buhayin ang Bangkay.

In contrast, during the Brooklyn Theatre fire of December 5, 1876, theatre staff were reluctant to cause a panic by shouting fire and instead pretended that the fire was part of the performance. This delayed the evacuation, leading to a death toll of at least 278.

See also


This page was last updated at 2022-12-08 00:18 UTC. Update now. View original page.

All our content comes from Wikipedia and under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License.


Top

If mathematical, chemical, physical and other formulas are not displayed correctly on this page, please useFirefox or Safari